Friday 20 May 2016

here’s proof of No Justice for Brian Pead





Brian Pead was released from prison on 18 March 2016 where he had been unlawfully held.
He had been sentenced to TWO YEARS for sending Christmas and birthday cards to his beloved daughter and grandchildren through the office of his MP.


In other words, an innocent man doing an innocent thing.


Now read below about a female teacher who had sex with a 16-year-old boy and note that she only got SIX MONTHS in prison. Justice – what Justice? The devil is always in the detail – SHE is a sex offender, HE is a former Head teacher EXPOSING sex abuse in Lambeth Council.


© News Shopper
An Orpington teacher, who groomed a 16-year-old male pupil and had sex with him even after his mother demanded she break off the relationship, has been jailed.
Lauren Cox, 27, broke down at Croydon Crown Court as she was sentenced to 12 months in prison for her relationship with the victim between February and September last year.
Cox taught the boy, who cannot be named for legal reasons, at a prestigious school in Orpington before beginning a sexual relationship with him when he turned 16.
The boy’s mother had a “sixth sense” about the relationship after her son made up two girlfriends to cover up the affair, Croydon Crown Court was told.
The affair came to light when the mother asked her son about his relationship with Cox.
When Cox, who was married, met up with the victim to dissolve the relationship she had sex with him again.
The court heard on one occasion in June last year Cox took a day off to meet the boy, who was on study leave.
Mr Brian Reece, prosecuting, said: “The defendant bunked off school so as to meet and have sex with a pupil.”
Cox also sent the victim sexual photos and videos of herself naked and masturbating and spanking herself, however there was no evidence the boy had sent her any photographs.
Defence counsel Ronnie Manek said Cox was of previous “exemplary good character” and she had submitted a guilty plea.
Sentencing, Judge Adam Hiddleston said: “She [the victim’s mother] allowed you to break the news, when you met you didn’t do as you had said, you used that meeting to have sex with the boy again.”
Cox was sentenced to 12 months in prison for five counts of sexual activity with a child under 18 in a position of trust.
She has also been put on the sexual offenders’ register for 10 years.

Here are some of Brian Pead's forthcoming titles:





Top of Form
Title :
From Hillsborough to Lambeth
Main Contributor :
Brian Pead
:
ISBN13 :
9780957430105
Imprint :
Invenire Press
:
Date Published :
31 Oct 2012
Format :
Paperback
:
Publishing Status :
Active
Bottom of Form


Top of Form
Title :
Tony Martin: THE TRUTH
Main Contributor :
Brian Pead
:
ISBN13 :
9780995475502
Imprint :
Invenire Press
:
Date Published :
01 Dec 2016
Format :
Paperback
:
Publishing Status :
Forthcoming
Bottom of Form




Brian Pead assists farmer Tony Martin 

in quest for Truth and Justice

A Freedom of Information Act request was made of the Cambridgeshire Constabulary. This is their response:

Dear Mr Martin
FREEDOM OF INFORMATION REQUEST REFERENCE NO: 0474/2016
In reply to your request for information under the Freedom of Information Act 2000, received in the constabulary as follows;

Please provide me with a True Copy of all flight logs of any helicopters flying over (redacted specified address) on 20 and 21 August 1999.
I also require details of all written communications with regard to the flight(s) in whatsoever format.
I also require a copy of all reports which describe what the searches found/ did not find.
I also require the names of all personnel on board the helicopter(s) on the dates previously mentioned.
We have completed all searches within Cambridgeshire Constabulary and hereby enclose your response.

Response
Unfortunately, we have been unable to locate any information to satisfy your request, as we do not hold this information. Having conducted research I would conclude that there may be a number of reasons as to why this would be. Firstly, the investigation was conducted by Norfolk Constabulary so any relevant records relating to that investigation would be held by them – this would include any information created at the time by this constabulary, if any. Local records would not be retained for this length of time. Secondly, we no longer operate a helicopter from Cambridgeshire as this service was passed across to the NPAS in 2013: any remaining flight logs or records would have been transferred at that time. Again, relevant information relating to the specified investigation would have been passed to the investigating force in Norfolk.
If you are unhappy with your response and wish to appeal our decisions, please see the attachment, which sets out your rights to appeal.
Should you have any further enquiries concerning this matter, please contact the Information Access Office via email, or on telephone number 01480 456 111 extension 2092.
Regards
David Price
Information Access Office
Cambridgeshire Constabulary

Thursday 19 May 2016

Brian Pead acts as Norfolk farmer Tony Martin's McKenzie Friend in Court



Here is the evidence that on 10 may 2016, Brian Pead acted as Tony Martin's McKenzie Friend in the King's Lynn County Court.

 

http://www.lambethchildabuse.org/brian-pead-acts-as-tony-martins-mckenzie-friend-in-court-the-proof/


Brian Pead made homeless by Home Office determined to cover-up child abuse in Lambeth Council


Upon leaving prison on 18 March 2016 - where Brian Pead was illegally held - he was made immediately homeless. 

He paid for a Bed and Breakfast at the Guanock Hotel in London Road, King's Lynn before finding accommodation at a house in Terrington St. Clement.

After only one night, Brian was evicted. The reason stated was that the woman, a Trish Benson (and claiming to be a counsellor), has "Googled" him and found out things that scared her! You would have thought that a counsellor worth her salt would have either (a) Googled Brian first or (b) not believed everything she read online. Heaven help her clients if she she believes everything they tell her!

Oh, by the way, her husband is ... a prison officer.

Only a person suffering from delusion or mentally defective would not conclude that the long arm of the Home Office was not at play.


HOME OFFICE instruct the Teachers' Pensions Agency 

to claim Brian owes them £25,0000 !


Brian Pead applied to the Teachers' Pension Agency for his pension after some 25 years in the profession.

A Mr Marc Chambers responded by claiming that Brian owed the TPA some £25,000 which is, of course, abject nonsense. Brian's response can be found below:

Dear Mr Chambers,

For the avoidance of doubt, the delusional part of your letter was where you claimed I owed the TPA some £25,000.

I do not owe the TPA any monies.

I draw your attention to the law of Misconduct in Public Office (a criminal offence) and also the Fraud Act 2006 (specifically section 2).

You are a public servant and, as such, have a duty of care towards me which you are currently failing to observe. No doubt you are working under the misapprehension that you will be covered by your job title and ultimately the UK Government but, as Hillsborough has finally proven, that is no longer the case for ANY public servant.

I respectfully suggest that you also research Commercial Liens.

And my website: www.LambethChildAbuse.org (where, as Head Teacher, I exposed child bause, racism and bullying as mentioned in my BANNED book from Hillsborough to Lambeth. Should you continue to adopt a negative, unhelpful and inaccurate approach to my pension, I shall be forced to conclude that you condone child abuse and I shall make that observation public via the <a href="http://www.LambethChildAbuse.org" target="_blank">LambethChildAbuse.org</a> website and others.

I note that you have failed to provide me with the full contact details of your Line Manager as requested.

As the author of this email, I reserve the right to accord it with whatever status I see fit. Because of your unhelpful - and directly and fraudulent misleading - response, I have accorded this email with the status of "AN OPEN LETTER". It will, accordingly, be published on the internet.

In order to "cover your back", you should think very carefully about reporting child abuse in Lambeth. A failure to report it to your Line Manager - providing me with evidence of such - would add further credibility to the suggestion that you condone child abuse.

Yours sincerely,
Brian Pead
<a title="Lambeth Child Abuse" href="http://www.LambethChildAbuse.org" target="_blank">www.LambethChildAbuse.org </a>

On 5/18/2016 at 5:19 PM, "Marc Chambers" wrote:
Dear Brian

I’m not sure what part of my letter was delusional but thank you for your comments.

I have referred your email onto our Benefits team who will assist you in drawing your pension.

Please let me know if I can be of any assistance in the meantime.

Regards

Marc

From: brianpead@hushmail.com [mailto:brianpead@hushmail.com]
Sent: 17 May 2016 16:14
To: Chambers, Marc
Subject: Re: Teachers' Pensions

Dear Mr Chambers,

I am in receipt of your delusional email.

Please provide the following evidence:

1. a list of ALL pension contributions made by me

2. a list of ALL pension payments to me

3. confirmation that as of 01 May 2016 I deem myself retired and therefore wish to receive my Teacher's Pension

4. the name of your Line Manager

5. copies of all communications (in whatsoever format) between the Home Office and the TPA.

Kind regards

Brian Pead

Sent using Hushmail

On 4/28/2016 at 1:23 PM, "Marc Chambers"wrote:

Mr B Pead

89 Days Lane

Sidcup

Kent

DA15 8JP

Our Reference

84/52733

28 April 2016

Dear Mr Pead

Further to ongoing correspondence regarding the £25,533.61 overpayment of pension. Please accept this letter as our annual reminder letter that debt remains outstanding and will be recovered at the time you claim your retirement benefits.

Please provide an estimate on when you intend to claim your retirement benefits in order for us to note our system.

It has also been highlighted that an interim repayment has not commenced. We must ask that you give consideration to a repayment plan and make contact with us to discuss your proposals. Whilst the majority of the overpayment will be recovered at the time you claim your benefits, we are required for the overpayment to be in recovery in the meantime. This can be for an amount that is affordable to you. Standing order forms can then be issued for repayment to commence.

Please write to us at the address at the bottom of this page, call us on 01325 745800 or email us at tpoverpayments@teacherspensions.co.uk.

Yours sincerely

Marc Chambers

Pensions Administrator

Wednesday 18 May 2016

Justice for the Hillsborough families – now we want Justice for Brian Pead

Justice for the 96. And their families. Now we demand Justice for Brian Pead. And his family. And for abused children in Lambeth and elsewhere.

Brian Pead meets Driscoll of the Yard

MINUTES OF MEETING
Date: 09 March 2015
Venue: The Port Jackson public house, Bishop’s Stortford, Essex
Attendees: retired Detective Chief Inspector Clive Driscoll [CD],
Michael Bird [MB] (co-author of From Hillsborough to Lambeth),
William Brian Freeman [WBF] (formerly known as Brian Pead) (co-author of From Hillsborough to Lambeth) and other books including FRAMED! and 10Prisons12Weeks
1. CD opened the meeting by declaring that he had called it in order to “seek justice for Brian and his family”;
2. CD added that Lambeth Council was known to be a ‘corrupt Borough’ and that a common consensus was that “everyone was on the fiddle”;
3. The consequence of [2] was that people who came to learn about child abuse perpetrated by others would not expose it for fear of themselves being exposed for wrongdoing such as, for example, financial mismanagement;
4. CD added that there was a strong Catholic and Masonic presence in Lambeth and within the Police;
5. WBF informed CD that the female teacher he dismissed for grooming and other offences had been a teacher at St Augustine’s Catholic School in Ealing and that the Executive Director of Lambeth’s Children and Young People’s Service is a Governor at La Retraite Catholic School in Lambeth;
6. CD commented that “Lambeth have been vicious to you, Brian, and it can’t be just because of what you wrote in the book from Hillsborough to Lambeth”;
7. CD stated that he read the book and agreed with its contents;
8. CD stated that WBF was “…flagged up at Scotland Yard as being a major threat because of your research and books…” and that WBF had been “…subjected to a sustained period of persecution by the Met as a direct consequence of this…”;
9. CD suggested that WBF write to his MP seeking justice, to enquire whether he is on the Sex Offenders’ Register (since people are sometimes added to it in error), if he is on it, why he is on it and for what period of time;
10. CD said that he would try to obtain a transcript of the entire Southwark trial;
11. CD stated that a major difficulty with quashing the Southwark (2009) conviction for alleged incitement was that WBF had “out-stung” a police sting operation and that if Brian’s conviction had been quashed it might have led to hundreds (if not thousands) of other convictions being quashed at great cost to the Government in terms of (a) compensation and (b) a large number of unsafe convictions;
12. WBF stated – and this was confirmed by MB – that it was an injustice to him and his family that his conviction “might not yet be quashed” simply because of other cases. WBF stated that he was not interested in other cases, only his own;
13. CD added that the case of alleged incitement of a non-existent girl (Southwark, 2009) could and should be quashed because of misdirections from the judge, his placing the jury under duress to reach a decision on the last day of the Michaelmas Term and mis-Joinder;
14. WBF added that there were a number of significant abuses of process in the Southwark conviction which could ordinarily lead to his conviction being quashed and not necessarily convictions of others whose circumstances could be very different from his own;
15. WBF informed CD that he (WBF) had two (2) police national computer (PNC) records, and this was confirmed by MB;
16. CD stated that it was not ordinarily possible for anybody to have two such records and that one must clearly be false;
17. MB confirmed that at Southend Police station in January 2013, a civilian administrator also stated that the record he had called up on the PNC appeared to be false;
18. WBF stated that this record contained at least six (6) convictions for rapes and other sexual assaults against females under 13 and that none of them was true;
19. CD stated that they could not have been true because otherwise Brian would not be at liberty;
20. CD stated that this false record needed to be expunged – he suggested that WBF write to the Commissioner of the Met, Sir Bernard Hogan-Howe and inform him that WBF has never been arrested, charged, indicted for these offences, that it was dishonest of someone to create a second PNC record showing false data, that there has been a lot of corruption in WBF’s cases and also conspiracy and “…huge breaches of you and your family’s human rights…”;
21. WBF stated that he would do this within the next week or two [Editor’s Note: this was not possible since Brian was committed to prison and had no written records with him];
22. CD suggested that WBF obtain the MAPPA file against him because (a) he is entitled to it and (b) it is likely to throw up information that would prove mistakes had been made on the part of the Police and/or Lambeth Council;
23. CD suggested that Brian write to the Department of Professional Standards, Empress State Building, London;
24. WBF stated that he knew of two rogue officers within that building and was therefore loathe to have their own colleagues investigate them as such investigations usually resulted in a whitewash;
25. CD stated that it was appalling the effect that these cases were not only having on WBF but also his daughter and grandchildren and that, as a grandfather himself, he could not imagine the distress this was causing both to WBF and his family members;
26. WBF mentioned that his son-in-law owned a garage repairing vehicles for the Met Police and that the police could well have taken advantage of this business relationship to turn Brian’s family against him and feed them false information;
27. CD added that it was likely they have been misinformed and shown false documents against WBF which had led them to no longer have contact;
28. CD added that there was “…undoubtedly an element of dishonesty…” somewhere in all of these cases, stating that had Brian been guilty of the alleged improper activity online, then he (CD) would not have prosecuted but – at most – written a warning letter about conduct. CD said that he could not understand why the case ever went to court at Southwark in 2009;
29. CD added that in his opinion WBF ought to write to his MP about numerous breaches of the Human Rights Act 1998 and that people in various agencies of State were clearly making decisions based on false PNC records and other data;
30. WBF informed CD about his and his brothers’ abuse in a children’s home in Harpenden, Hertfordshire known as ‘The Oval’ from 1955 to 1960 and CD suggested that WBF write to the MP for Harpenden [Editor’s Note: due to his incarceration without recourse to his records, this was not achieved until 08 April 2016];
31. CD asked what level of compensation that WBF would ultimately be seeking – WBF stated that he had initiated a claim against Lambeth in 2013 for £5million;
32. CD suggested that this might be “selling yourself short considering everything that Lambeth have done to you over almost a decade”;
33. A figure of £30 million was suggested to include claims against Lambeth Council, three police forces, Off Centre counselling charity and other organisations and individuals;
34. WBF invited CD to write a chapter for a second edition of the book From Hillsborough to Lambeth but CD stated that he would be unable to do so given that there are on-going investigations into child abuse in Lambeth Council;
35. WBF informed CD that he was writing a new book about the Tony Martin case in 1999 and invited CD to write a chapter about that case – CD stated that he would be pleased to since “…murder is my speciality…”;
36. CD stated that he believed that Michael Mansfield would be “…an ideal barrister…” to assist Brian in quashing his convictions, restoring his good name and receiving compensation;
37. MB agreed that this would be a good choice of barrister;
38. WBF stated that he would be willing to work with Mr Mansfield;
39. CD stated that he would approach Mr Mansfield on WBF’s behalf [Editor’s Note: this has not yet been achieved];
40. CD provided a business card to MB and WBF – this card included CD’s home address and mobile telephone number.
41. END OF MINUTES ………………………………………………………………

Scotland Yard being held accountable in child abuse cover-up

From: w.b.freeman
16 May 2016
Dear Metropolitan Police Service (MPS),
1. Can Scotland Yard explain why Brian Pead has TWO police national computer records?
2. Can Scotland Yard explain why Brian Pead was placed un lawful surveillance from 2006 when he exposed child abuse in Lambeth?
3. Can Scotland Yard explain why Brian Pead’s daughter and grandchildren did not attend Bexley Magistrates’ Court on 1st November 2011 and yet the Court issued a bogus Restraining Order against him for the alleged harassment of his daughter, Sorrel Birch, and grandchildren Emily, Lauren and Joseph?
4. Can Scotland Yard explain why retired Detective Chief inspector Clive Driscoll stated on 09 March 2015 that Brian and his family had been persecuted by the Met for 10 years? (see attached Minutes of the meeting)
5. Can Scotland Yard explain why PC John Brown, of Bexley Police, who was castigated by Judge Robinson at Woolwich Crown Court in January 2012 for lying and providing false evidence to the court, has never been charged with perverting the course of public justice and other criminal offences?
6. Can Scotland Yard explain why corrupt DC Julia Godfrey and DS Jason Tunn, who unlawfully seized a computer belonging to Geoffrey Bacon – a man of integrity – were not charged under the Computer Misuse Act and why they have not been charged with perverting the course of justice?
7. Can Scotland Yard explain why Nicola Noone, from the counselling charity Off Centre, was never prosecuted for perjury at Southwark in December 2009 at Brian Pead’s bogus trial for the alleged incitement of a non-existent 14 year old female?
8. Can Scotland Yard explain why Brian Pead continues to be persecuted by the Police when he does not commit crime?
9. Can Scotland Yard provide a copy of the Warrant issued under the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000 authorising them to keep Brian Pead under constant surveillance since 2006?
10. Can Scotland Yard provide a copy of the police submission for a Warrant to conduct house searches on the house of Geoffrey Bacon, of Brian Pead and the offices of Off Centre?
11. Can Scotland Yard provide a copy of the Court Register at Bexley Magistrates’ Court from 01 November 2011 showing the trial that allegedly took place there and any Order of the Court made there that day?
12. Can Scotland Yard explain the comment made by legal representative Marcia Weise at Charing Cross police station on 04 June 2008 to Brian Pead – “You have been intelligent enough to out-sting an illegal police sting operation and they will be out to get you!” ?
13. Can Scotland Yard confirm that it has been instrumental in a cover-up of child abuse in Lambeth in the period 2005-2007?
14. Can Scotland Yard confirm DCI Driscoll’s comments that Brian Pead’s family have also been persecuted by way of false allegations against him are true?
15. Can Scotland Yard provide the chain of custody relating to Geoffrey Bacon’s computer unlawfully seized from his house on 31 July 2008?
16. Can Scotland Yard confirm that Brian Pead has never been dismissed from Lambeth Council for allegedly being masturbated in a theatre?
17. Can Scotland Yard confirm that Phyllis Dunipace, OBE was once Executive Director of Children and Young People’s Service in Lambeth?
18. Can Scotland Yard explain why secretary Beverley Williams said to Brian Pead: “You are being treated so badly by Lambeth” when referring to his unlawful dismissal?
19. Can Scotland Yard explain why employment law expert Alex Passman told Brian Pead in April 2007 that he was “being set up by Lambeth Council” in relation to the bogus disciplinary proceedings against him?
20. Can Scotland Yard confirm that it was instrumental in getting the book “from Hillsborough to Lambeth” banned at the High Court and if so, can it provide a copy of the Court order for our records?
Yours faithfully,
w.b.freeman

Andy Burnham MP sent email on Lambeth child abuse by Brian Pead

Today, Brian Pead sent MP Andy Burnham further evidence of child abuse in Lambeth. It remains to be seen whether the Leigh, Manchester MP is as pro-active in securing Justice for Brian Pead and his family as he was in the Hillsborough disaster. 

Brian Pead sends Open Letter to MP Sir Henry Bellingham re Lambeth child abuse cover-up



Dear Sir Henry,
AN OPEN LETTER (and attachment, Information Memorandum, version 7 – provided at your request)
As you will see, I have ensured that I have copied this email to law lecturers at the University of Greenwich, at which I studied in 2010 following the conviction for Incitement at Southwark in December 2009 which you have finally acknowledged as being unsafe.
Kim Everett, University of Greenwich law lecturer
I discussed this case at great length with my Law Tutor, Kim Everett, and she confirmed that I could not possibly be guilty of such a crime under the rule of law. She advised me not to mention the word ‘ corruption’, but I did not heed her advice because of Hillsborough (a football match which, as you know, I attended). Professor Phil Scraton has gone on the public record using the word ‘corruption’ because that is precisely what occurred at Hillsborough and what occurred in my trial at Southwark in 2009 and subsequent trials in a decade-long campaign of persecution against me as described by retired Scotland Yard detective chief inspector Clive Driscoll in a meeting with me on 09 March 2015 (just 10 days before my unlawful incarceration).
It should also be noted that when I met with Ms Everett in December 2014, she told me “It wasn’t me who screwed you over at the University, Brian.” I leave you to draw your own inferences to her remarks. For the public record, I know full well to whom she was referring.
My ‘tone’
I note from your last email that you were not happy with my ‘tone’. I make no apologies for that. You have had full chapter and verse on the human rights abuses of me and my family for 3 years since I first gave you a copy of Framed! on October 2013 (and a second, signed copy on 15 April 2016). You were presented with an Information Memorandum – at your request – in May 2014 when I took it to your house in Congham, Norfolk
Thus you have been in possession of all of the facts of (a) my innocence in all matters and (b) the human rights abuses (including my Article 3 Official Complaint) for some time and not written a single letter on my behalf, save for a letter to Prisons Minister Andrew Selous who attempted to justify my being ghosted between 10 prisons in just 12 weeks in 2014 (just days after I provided you with incontrovertible evidence of my innocence and police corruption à la Hillsborough).
In some quarters in Norfolk it has been suggested that your knighthood was a reward for sitting on my cases and failing to work towards a resolution. On 15 April 2016, you stated that you would “go at this hammer and tongs” on my behalf. This has not happened. In your previous email, you stated that you had written to Michael Mansfield QC yet failed to provide a copy of that letter to me. Anyone can provide a letter, back-date it and pass it off as having been sent on my behalf some days/ weeks ago.
My meritorious claim v Lambeth Council
On 17 February 2015, when we met at the Knights Hill Hotel, you urged me to bring a claim against Lambeth Council because you recognised – as a Tort lawyer – that I had a meritorious claim against that corrupt Borough (this also the opinion of Alex Passman et al)
However, in your most recent email, you thought that “too much time had elapsed”. This is, quite frankly, nonsense. As you are aware, Lambeth Council took me to the High Court in London on 16 July 2013 and attempted to obtain a permanent gagging order against me. Since then, of course, it has been established that that Council’s corrupt officers have been instrumental in having me incarcerated yet again.
Home Office
It is clear that all of this persecution against me (and vicariously my family) has been orchestrated at the very top level – the Home Office. I have evidence of this: in February 2010 (just two months after my ‘conviction’ at Southwark, an online blog called “Blood and Property” contacted MP Meg Hillier (of Hackney) who told the blog that she was unable to deal with its questions but that all questions should go through the Home Office. It is self-evident that some very corrupt people at Lambeth (including, but not limited to, child abusers) are being protected by the Home Office and, of course, that your colleague, Mrs Theresa May, is therefore guilty of allowing the human rights abuses of me and my family.
Further request for a constituency meeting
I asked for another meeting and note that your PA has failed to respond to me with some dates. Could it be that the Home Office is working on a narrative that it will return me to prison on yet another bogus charge – this time, perhaps, spuriously claiming that I have broken my licence conditions? Or are the spin doctors at the Home Office conspiring with Scotland Yard to create yet another false narrative of some ‘historical sex abuse case’ against me as a former teacher of 25 years (with never such accusations against me).
Proven lies by Lambeth Council in my wrongful dismissal
It may also interest you to know that Lambeth Council DID confess to the Blood and Property blog that I had NEVER been dismissed from Lambeth Council for “masturbating in a theatre” – this allegation coming from the teacher I dismissed for child grooming, racism and bullying. Now, it stands to reason that if this lie has finally been laid to rest, all of the other accusations brought against me by Lambeth Council are also false (which, for the record, I state that they are false.) This can be confirmed by employment law specialist Alex Passman, who told me in April 2007 “Brian, you are being set up by Lambeth Council.” He also confirmed that he had been accurately portrayed in my banned book from Hillsborough to Lambeth. I suggest that you contact Alex who will also confirm to you what he told me.
Third party proof of innocence
And, as you know from reading the Information Memorandum I gave you in May 2014 – at your request – Alasdair Palmer of the Daily Telegraph also confirmed that I could not possibly be guilty of the crime of incitement (or an attempt). He confirmed this as long ago as 20 August 2012 – yet the corrupt CCRC has failed to quash that conviction. This, of course, is being orchestrated by the Home Office as it continues its persecution of me and my innocent daughter and grandchildren.
Gross Prosecutorial Abuse by Tristan Chaize
Furthermore, at the bogus trial for alleged breaches of a non-existent Restraining Order in July 2015 at the Inner London Crown Court, Prosecutor Tristan Chaize of Tunbridge Wells said to me “You think you are somebody because you have a banned book and two gagging orders against you, but I’m telling you that you’re nothing…you’re a nobody… you have all these criminal convictions against you…your family don’t want to know you … ” and so his mindless rant continued. Now, being an intelligent man and being a qualified counsellor and having studied psychology for over 50 years, it doesn’t take a genius to work out that the very OPPOSITE is true. Mr Chaize rather inelegantly attempted to make me feel bad but, as Eleanor Roosevelt once proclaimed “Nobody can make you feel bad without your consent” and, of course, I did not give Mr Chaize my consent. That he has clearly sold his soul is not my concern – that is a matter for his own conscience if he still possesses one.
You will recall that, on your suggestion, I asked you to send Christmas cards and birthday cards to my family members from your office. In any event, the cards never reached them. An innocent bystander, the “man on the Clapham omnibus” or the “reasonable person” as defined by the Courts, might reasonably assume that you were setting me up to fail so that I could be imprisoned just as the time Lambeth Council was to feature in the Independent Inquiry into Child Sexual Abuse.
The Home Secretary and RIPA
I have written to the Home Secretary on at least six occasions asking for a copy of the Warrant under which I am being kept under constant surveillance and have been since 2006 when I first blew the whistle on child abuse in Lambeth (since corroborated by retired DCI Clive Driscoll, the Shirley Oaks Survivors Association [SOSA], Anna Tapsell, Tom Pettifor of the Daily Mirror et al).
I ask that you write to the Home Secretary to provide me with a True Copy of the Warrant obtained against me under RIPA 2000.
For the avoidance of doubt, I am continually held under surveillance to this day. All forms of my communications are still being intercepted, monitored and often “lost” in transit or transmission. Please ask the Home Secretary under what authority she believes she is acting.
My beloved family
You suggested in your email to me that I contact my daughter through a third party to seek a reconciliation. I showed this to my probation officer – a mere pawn in the game of chess played by the Home Office – and she said that if I followed your advice she would send me back to prison. (She is working in the belief that she can scare me.) Now, you have given me advice regarding my family which saw me imprisoned unlawfully and almost imprisoned (had I followed it). Perhaps you can now understand why in certain quarters in Norfolk the idea has been mooted that your actions against me are maliciously motivated and not helpful as they ought to be from an MP to his or her constituent. You will understand, of course, I merely report the “word on the street” and do not necessarily subscribe to that view.
My aims
My aims remain the same as they have always been from Day One:
1. Quash my convictions (they are all bogus and against the rule of law);
2. To be re-united with my family (after the Met lied to them in order to ‘divide and conquer’ and provide me with no emotional or financial support;
3. To be significantly compensated by the State for the detriment caused to me by some corrupt agents of State
Your constituent
You attempted to claim in your previous email to me that I might not be your constituent since I am not on the electoral roll. You will know, of course, that you have thousands of constituents who are not on the roll and I am one of them.
You then attempted to threaten me by saying that I should be fortunate that you are my MP since no other MP in the country would be willing to help.
Should your line of reasoning be followed to its conclusion, that would make me a Stateless person, bringing another interesting perspective to this long, sorry State-controlled sage brought about to cover-up child abuse and police corruption.
Policing by Consent
It is clear that in the UK, policing is by consent. I have written to the Home Secretary and removed my consent to be policed. I commit no crimes and therefore I have no business with the Police. They think it’s rather amusing to stop me and ask if I have any underage girls in the back of my car, or accuse me of jumping red traffic lights or to ask why I have tinted windows on my car. Please write to Mrs May and inform her that I have absolutely no interest in the Police (other than exposing corrupt ones) and that they have no consent to approach me, talk to me, or apprehend me in any way.
Simon Bailey, Chief Constable Norfolk
I ask that you contact Mr Bailey to ask him to provide answers to the following in writing:
1. What does he propose to do about my Apple McIntosh computer his officers unlawfully seized from Ivy Farm, Tilney All Saints on 2 August 2013?
2. Why has he allowed his officers to manipulate documents against me à la Hillsborough?
3. Why, as national lead for child abuse, has he failed to meet me with regarding my book from Hillsborough to Lambeth?
4. Why has he abused his position of trust in allowing human rights abuses to be perpetrated against me?
5. Why did he sanction 12 visits to Darby Farm, Pott Row by officers under his control and yet not one of those visits was lawfully recorded as is normal police protocol?
I have little doubt that you will take mock offence at this latest communication. For a politician with as many years in Parliament as you have, you do rather seem to have a somewhat thin skin.
I look forward to our next meeting when, I hope, you have some good news to impart along the following lines:
1. Meetings lined up with Michael Mansfield, QC to quash my spurious convictions;
2. A meeting with my family in which they can be told the Truth by Mr Mansfield and Baroness Lawrence (whose family also suffered through police corruption);
3. Meetings with bona fide high-profile lawyers to bring claims against Lambeth Council, Off Centre, the Met Police, Essex Police, Norfolk Police and others.
Yours sincerely,
Brian Pead 

Kenny Dalglish in cover-up of Child Abuse in Lambeth



Dear Liverpool Echo Reporter,
KING KENNY – IDOL OF THE KOP – IN COVER-UP OF CHILD ABUSE
Dare you print the story below or will the Echo – so proud of its work on exposing corruption at Hillsborough – actually itself be involved in a cover-up of Child Abuse in Lambeth?
Brian Pead is the author of:
Liverpool: A Complete Record, 1892-1986
Liverpool: A Complete Record, 1892-1988
Liverpool: A Complete Record, 1892-1990
Liverpool: Champions of Champions, 1990
Liverpool: Ee Aye Addio, We’ve Won the Cup! (1993)
From Hillsborough to Lambeth (banned at the High Court)
Framed!
10Prisons 12 Weeks
(currently completing Tony Martin: THE TRUTH
and, working as a Head Teacher in Lambeth, London, he exposed child abuse (since corroborated by retired Scotland Yard detective Clive Driscoll https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iXC6pVx_T-I
Brian has videos on YouTube too https://www.google.co.uk/#q=youtube+brian+pead
In 2013, Liverpool FC allowed a defamatory post about Mr Pead to be uploaded. He travelled to 20 Church Street and provided Mr Dalglish with a copy of from Hillsborough to Lambeth, together with a copy of Framed! He has not replied to Mr Pead, in person, orally or in writing.
It is therefore reasonable to assume that Mr Dalglish, lauded for his stance on police corruption at Hillsborough, is actually condoning police corruption in the cover-up of child abuse in Lambeth.
This Open Letter has been posted on the www.LambethChildAbuse.org website hosted in Slovakia, outside of the jurisdiction of England & Wales.
Brian Pead is always willing to meet with Mr Dalglish and representatives of Liverpool FC and the Liverpool Echo.
Please also note that MP Andy Burnham – not Brian Pead’s MP – is aware of the situation: his letter from 2012 is included in this email.
Please call Brian Pead on 0756 400 2493 for more detail.
Yours sincerely,
The Office for Exposing Lambeth Corruption

LAMBETH WHISTLEBLOWER
VICTIM OF STATE PERSECUTION:

· currently made HOMELESS
· four unlawful PRISON SENTENCES to silence him
· TWO unlawful gagging orders against him
· BANNED from entering the London Borough of Bexley
· wrongly LABELLED a sex offender
· wrongly ACCUSED of impersonating a barrister
· wrongly ACCUSED of criminal damage
· wrongly ACCUSED of harassing his daughter (who has never made a complaint or appeared in court against him)
· author of BANNED BOOK (entitled FROM HILLSBOROUGH TO LAMBETH) exposing child abuse and its cover-up in Lambeth where he worked as the Head Teacher of a pupil referral unit
· BEATEN UP in the street by police officers (witnesses threatened by police and told to keep quiet)
What will YOU do to right this wrong?
Please contact Brian’s MP, Sir Henry Bellingham, with the following or similar:

Dear Sir Henry Bellingham,
As a decent citizen and taxpayer, I am appalled that a man who exposed child abuse in Lambeth Council has been subjected to such abuse by the State. Lambeth Council is one of the local authorities being investigated by the Independent Inquiry into Child Sexual Abuse (IICSA) headed by Judge Lowell Goddard. Please visit www.LambethChildAbuse.org and www.Justice4BrianPead.com for more information.
I am/ We are calling for a Judicial Review of all of his cases so that the Truth might finally emerge as occurred with Hillsborough. No country should treat whistleblowers in this way. Please provide evidence of how you have assisted your constituent and reported child abuse to the Independent Inquiry (IICSA).
Email: bellinghamh@parliament.uk
Letter: Henry Bellingham MP, House of Commons, London, SW1A 0AA
Telephone: King’s Lynn Office on 01553 692 076
Brian’s contact details:
Email: brianpead@hushmail.com
Letter: Spire View, Cotts Lane, Tilney All Saints, Norfolk, PE34 4SL
Telephone: 07564002493
PLEASE KEEP A RECORD OF ALL YOUR COMMUNICATIONS
If you are unable to make contact with Brian or do not receive a reply to your telephone calls, letters or emails, please assume that this is the result of police interference with his (and your) communications and contact your Chief Constable and the Home Secretary to complain about the erosion of your civil liberties and the unlawful interference in your communications. (This is just one way that the authorities try to cover-up child abuse – all at YOUR expense as a taxpayer.)

LETTER TO KENNY DALGLISH,
DIRECTOR OF LIVERPOOL FOOTBALL CLUB



Mr K.M. Dalglish
Director
Liverpool Football Club
Anfield Road
Liverpool
L4 0TH
10 October 2013
Dear Mr Dalglish,
AN OPEN LETTER OF COMPLAINT TO KENNY DALGLISH OF LIVERPOOL FOOTBALL CLUB
Firstly, All Around Justice would like to extend its congratulations to you on your appointment as a Director of Liverpool Football Club. This organisation is aware not only of your exploits as a player and manager, but also as an ambassador of the club during the dark days of Hillsborough.
All Around Justice is a small, privately-funded organisation which seeks to overturn miscarriages of justice and to defend the most vulnerable members of society, including a 91 year old woman who was unlawfully evicted from her home by the Council, whose officers also stole more than £1.5m of her antiques and other possessions.
The purpose of this letter is to draw your attention to the plight of an innocent man who may, or may not, be known to you. You are asked to respond as a Liverpool FC Director (with the responsibilities that that role entails), as a human being and as a man who steered the football club through its dark days of Hillsborough and the two decades of police corruption that followed.
The man we wish to bring to your attention is Brian Pead, author of several books on the entire history of Liverpool FC from 1892. He has, in fact, met you on several occasions and you have kindly signed copies of his books for him. Brian has had various forewords to his books written by Billy Liddell, Bob Paisley and Tommy Smith, and undertaken book signing sessions with Mr Smith. He owns the world’s largest private collection of match reports on Liverpool FC.
In 2005, he took on the role as Head Teacher of a Pupil Referral Unit in Lambeth, London. The role provided educational and emotional support to disadvantaged pupils aged between 14 and 16. Brian’s management of the Unit was highly regarded by counselling psychologists with King’s College in London and the pupil referral unit was regarded by them as being “the best in London.”
In November 2006, Brian had cause to dismiss a female South African teacher who was guilty of child grooming, racism and bullying. At this point in his life, Brian was aged 53 and had no criminal record whatsoever and he had never had any allegations made against him in his entire career, including a quarter of a century in teaching.
However, just 3 weeks after dismissing the teacher (who had not been checked by the Criminal Records Bureau), Brian was unlawfully suspended by Lambeth Council officers and not even told the reasons why he was being dismissed—which is an unlawful act in itself.
In April 2007, Brian was replaced as a Head Teacher, despite the fact that he had not even been interviewed regarding his suspension.
On 31 July 2007, Brian was unlawfully dismissed by Lambeth Council.
Between September 2007 and May 2008, Brian was researching into child abuse on a social networking website known as Faceparty.com. He had uncovered an illegal sting operation being used by the police and drew this to their attention. The police then turned his investigation into their illegal activities on to him.
In December 2009, at Southwark Crown Court, Brian was found guilty of a charge of inciting a child under 16 to engage in sexual relations. There never was a victim—no such person existed. Brian had incited no-one. The Police had entirely fabricated the charge. The jury at his unlawful trial had not been sworn in. More than 125 exhibits were not shown in court. Key witnesses as to the fact of Brian’s innocence had not been called. The Court was told that the IT manager of Faceparty had emigrated to Australia whereas he was, in fact, still residing in London. The Court was never told about a computer belonging to a friend of Brian’s being seized unlawfully by the Police and evidence of Brian’s innocence being wiped off the hard drive by the Police.
The purpose of this Open Letter to you is not to re-live the corrupt trial because that can be found in the enclosed copy of Framed!
Before drawing your attention to how this impacts upon Liverpool Football Club, All Around Justice is compelled to inform you that Brian was sent to prison in September 2011 for the alleged witness intimidation of his 12 year old grand-daughter, who has never been a witness in any trial or Hearing.
Brian was unlawfully held on remand in Belmarsh Prison—a Category ‘A’ prison which was designed to house terrorists and murderers. Notwithstanding that abuse of his human rights, he was continually transferred between Belmarsh and Wandsworth Prisons every 3-4 days in an attempt to (a) psychologically de-stabilise him and (b) prevent friends and family from visiting or contacting him.
This action by agencies of the Government is a clear breach of his Article 3 Rights under the Human Rights Act 1998—‘No one shall be subjected to torture or to inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment.’
Article 3 is an absolute right; there are no possible derogations. Many of the rights conferred on citizens by the European Court of Human Rights can be over-ridden (i.e. derogated) in the public interest (e.g. in time of war, where there is a threat to public safety and so on); not so with Article 3. There is no possible excuse or justification for a breach of Article 3 along the lines of, for example, ‘an aggressive cross-examination of a rape victim is part of the adversarial system of justice and is in the public interest’.
As if all this were not bad enough, Brian was taken one morning from Belmarsh Prison directly to Bexley Magistrates’ Court where he was unlawfully found guilty of the harassment of his daughter and grand-daughter when neither had ever made complaints against him, neither had made a statement against him and neither appeared as witnesses against him. Nor had he ever been charged with harassment, and nor was there a CAD report reporting harassment. There was no Trial bundle.
It had all been an elaborate scam by the Police in order to prevent Brian from communicating with his daughter and pointing out the corruption by the police and judiciary and also to turn Brian’s attention away from exposing the child abuse he uncovered within Lambeth Council.
In March 2013, Brian was unlawfully jailed at Pentonville Prison for a month for alleged Contempt of Court regarding the book from Hillsborough to Lambeth in yet another move to silence him. The book is the subject of a banning order against it.
Furthermore, on 16 July 2013, Lambeth Council employed a highly regarded human rights lawyer (normally advocating free speech) to seek a permanent gagging order on Brian Pead, a man who—at the age of 10 had become mesmerised by the psychological management skills of Bill Shankly and who, at the age of 14, set about the task of uncovering the result of every match played by Liverpool FC from 1892. Three years earlier, the Police had sought a permanent search warrant on his house. Needless to say, neither application was granted but it demonstrates the level of threat that Brian’s research poses to the corrupt police and judiciary.
On 01 August 2013, Brian was arrested by armed police on a friend’s farm when he was offering legal assistance to that friend (also the victim of police and judicial corruption). Brian was charged with criminal damage, even though no evidence of criminal damage has been brought forward.
Whilst in police custody, Brian’s computer was removed—the second time that a computer he had used had been unlawfully removed. The Police are refusing to give it back. On that computer are the names of corrupt police constables, barristers and judges. The offences they are guilty of range from breaches of the Computer Misuse Act 1990 to Perverting the Course of Justice to Perjury.
Brian informs All Around Justice that he holds you in high esteem, not for your exploits as a player or manager of Liverpool Football Club, but for the dignified way in which you conducted yourself during the Hillsborough tragedy. You will know, of course, about the Hillsborough Independent Panel and the large number of documents which were created by corrupt officers. Brian has been just such a victim. He was in attendance on 15 April 1989 and saw for himself the mismanagement of high-ranking police officers, who then sought, as you will know, to defame the dead and the dying.
The specific relevance to Liverpool Football Club
Brian’s website drew attention to the book from Hillsborough to Lambeth and it gained a number of followers. The book itself drew attention to Brian’s unlawful dismissal by Lambeth which was corroborated by pupils, parents and staff. This differed significantly from the ̔official’ Lambeth Council version, of course, just as the accounts by genuine members of the public at Hillsborough differed from the ̔official’ police accounts (which, in any event, had been doctored by the police as has become evident.)
This followed the unlawful removal by the authorities of the www.allaroundjustice.com website which was created to highlight the police and judicial corruption.
The book from Hillsborough to Lambeth drew attention to police corruption between 1989 and 2013 and Andy Burnham, MP sent a letter commending Brian on his ‘search for justice’ and stating that he “read the book with great interest”. The same Andy Burnham who helped expose corruption in the Hillsborough tragedy.
Between 1 November 2012 and 7 January 2013, Liverpool Football Club was negligent by allowing defamatory statements to be made about Mr Brian Pead, an author and supporter of Liverpool FC for 50 years.
Liverpool FC allowed a Police constable to post the following comments on its website: “…Convicted Sex offender Brian Pead associating himself with Hillsborough Families…”
It was several hours before the offending post was removed, but in search engines that offending post still remains. Liverpool Football Club is liable for allowing such a defamatory post to be uploaded to its website.
For the avoidance of doubt, Mr Pead is an innocent man and the State’s unwarranted interference in his life—and of those he cares about—is a direct breach of his (and their) Article 3 Rights conferred upon him by the Human Rights Act 1998 and of his (and their) indefeasible human rights. As matters now stand, Liverpool FC is complicit in these human rights abuses.
Liverpool Football Club’s responsibilities
It is customary for corporations and companies to deny all responsibility for their wrong-doings: Hillsborough is a prime example. However, All Around Justice will not allow Liverpool FC to abrogate its responsibilities in this matter. The Human Rights of Brian Pead, his daughter and innocent grand-children are being breached by the Club, which had a duty to ensure that defamatory posts could not be uploaded to its website.
It is usual, of course, for major corporations (and even individuals) to allow comments posted by members of the public to be held in a secure ‘holding area’ (i.e. not published directly on to the internet). These comments are then carefully scrutinised and monitored and either uploaded for the world to see via the medium of the internet, or not uploaded and/ or discarded in a safe manner with no harm caused to any Party (in this case Brian Pead).
Liverpool FC is therefore guilty of negligence, although All Around Jsutice believes that it will deny all responsibility. That being the case, AAJ reserves the right to publicise Liverpool FC’s collusion with police corruption. We believe that this will create significant negative publicity for the Club which will undoubtedly, in our opinion, militate against the goodwill engendered by way of the Hillsborough Disaster and the police corruption highlighted in the Report which is in the public domain.
Furthermore, since Brian Pead’s work highlights police and judicial corruption and in exposing child abuse in its many forms, it could be said that Liverpool FC is complicit in covering up child abuse by aiding and abetting such a cover up.
As a lifelong Liverpool fan for half a century, Brian has informed AAJ that he wishes—wherever possible—to avoid litigation. He is of the belief that this breach of his human rights and this defamation can be resolved through constructive, mature dialogue with all parties sitting ̔round the table’. As a qualified therapist, Brian is always amenable to talking issues through before resorting to litigation.
AAJ is therefore requesting that you Chair such a meeting, since we believe that you will be fair–minded and a valid ambassador for the good name of Liverpool Football Club, as well as being able to call upon your experience of Hillsborough.
AAJ believes that it would be helpful to provide you with what might be properly regarded as ̔agenda items’ for such a meeting:
By way of remedy for the negligent acts and breaches of duty of care by Liverpool Football Club, Mr Pead is seeking the following:
a full and unreserved apology on the Liverpool Football Club website to be published in perpetuity
the terminology to be approved by Mr Pead and his advisors
a full and unreserved apology in the Liverpool Football Club matchday programme for the remainder of this season [2012-13 and all of next season 2013-14]
the terminology to be approved by Mr Pead and his advisors
a donation to the families of Hillsborough
compensation for psychological injury [payable to the families of the Hillsborough tragedy]
aggravated damages [payable to the families of the Hillsborough tragedy]
compensation for Mr Pead’s time in dealing with this matter [payable to the families of the Hillsborough tragedy]
all disbursements and travel expenses met by Liverpool FC
It is hoped that you will respond positively to our legitimate and reasonable requests for justice. You, perhaps more than anyone else currently at Liverpool FC, will know that the Sun newspaper ran a headline entitled THE TRUTH many years before it ran the headline THE REAL TRUTH.
Mr Dalglish, All Around Justice—just like the Hillsborough families—will not rest until THE REAL TRUTH about Brian Pead is put into the public domain.
Yours sincerely,
All Around Justice
Enclosures:
Framed!
Screenshot from Liverpool FC website 
Letter from Andy Burnham dated 30 November 2012 

Professor Phil Scraton responds to Brian Pead

Brian Pead wrote to Professor Phil Scraton (of Hillsborough fame) about his own examples of police and judicial corruption.
Today, the busy Professor took the time and trouble to respond and he wished Brian all best wishes in his fight for Justice.
The Professor urged caution over the use of the word corruption: he stated that it should be used sparingly and only in those cases where there are demonstrable examples of it.
Brian is of the same mind-set. He, too, never uses the word unless there is good reason and unless he can back it up with solid evidence. That solid evidence, of course, is to be found on this website and elsewhere.

Theresa May’s former speech-writer at odds with Home Secretary

Alasdair Palmer, Theresa May’s former speech-writer, sent an email to Brian Pead on 20 August 2012, stating:

“…I found your material extremely interesting. It is clear to me that 
  you were indeed the victim of an injustice, as you maintain…”

He referred, of course, to Brian’s unlawful conviction at Southwark Crown Court in 2009.
Since then, and some four years later, his former boss, Home Secretary Theresa May, no longer replies to Brian’s well-considered, polite letters exposing police corruption and child abuse in Lambeth Council.
Petition to cease State persecution of Brian Pead and his family


Yesterday, Brian Pead created a Petition against his human rights abuses and those of his family.
You are asked to sign the Petition.

The petition reads:

Stop Human Rights Abuses of Brian Pead
In 2006, Brian Pead exposed child abuse in Lambeth Council. He was unlawfully dismissed from his job as Head Teacher and since then has been wrongly accused of being a sex offender, sent unlawfully to prison on four occasions, been beaten up in the street by Police, and separated from his beloved family.
State persecution on an industrial scale was perpetrated against Brian and his family because the Home Office wanted to cover-up child abuse and police corruption in Lambeth and the Met.

Click this link to sign the petition:
https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/130661/sponsors/jzzGEfg8hr4xKjraUT