Brian Pead sends Open Letter to MP Sir Henry Bellingham re Lambeth child abuse cover-up
Dear Sir Henry,
AN OPEN LETTER (and attachment, Information Memorandum, version 7 – provided at your request)
As you will see, I have ensured that I have copied this email to law lecturers at the University of Greenwich, at which I studied in 2010 following the conviction for Incitement at Southwark in December 2009 which you have finally acknowledged as being unsafe.
Kim Everett, University of Greenwich law lecturer
I discussed this case at great length with my Law Tutor, Kim Everett, and she confirmed that I could not possibly be guilty of such a crime under the rule of law. She advised me not to mention the word ‘ corruption’, but I did not heed her advice because of Hillsborough (a football match which, as you know, I attended). Professor Phil Scraton has gone on the public record using the word ‘corruption’ because that is precisely what occurred at Hillsborough and what occurred in my trial at Southwark in 2009 and subsequent trials in a decade-long campaign of persecution against me as described by retired Scotland Yard detective chief inspector Clive Driscoll in a meeting with me on 09 March 2015 (just 10 days before my unlawful incarceration).
It should also be noted that when I met with Ms Everett in December 2014, she told me “It wasn’t me who screwed you over at the University, Brian.” I leave you to draw your own inferences to her remarks. For the public record, I know full well to whom she was referring.
My ‘tone’
I note from your last email that you were not happy with my ‘tone’. I make no apologies for that. You have had full chapter and verse on the human rights abuses of me and my family for 3 years since I first gave you a copy of Framed! on October 2013 (and a second, signed copy on 15 April 2016). You were presented with an Information Memorandum – at your request – in May 2014 when I took it to your house in Congham, Norfolk
Thus you have been in possession of all of the facts of (a) my innocence in all matters and (b) the human rights abuses (including my Article 3 Official Complaint) for some time and not written a single letter on my behalf, save for a letter to Prisons Minister Andrew Selous who attempted to justify my being ghosted between 10 prisons in just 12 weeks in 2014 (just days after I provided you with incontrovertible evidence of my innocence and police corruption à la Hillsborough).
In some quarters in Norfolk it has been suggested that your knighthood was a reward for sitting on my cases and failing to work towards a resolution. On 15 April 2016, you stated that you would “go at this hammer and tongs” on my behalf. This has not happened. In your previous email, you stated that you had written to Michael Mansfield QC yet failed to provide a copy of that letter to me. Anyone can provide a letter, back-date it and pass it off as having been sent on my behalf some days/ weeks ago.
My meritorious claim v Lambeth Council
On 17 February 2015, when we met at the Knights Hill Hotel, you urged me to bring a claim against Lambeth Council because you recognised – as a Tort lawyer – that I had a meritorious claim against that corrupt Borough (this also the opinion of Alex Passman et al)
However, in your most recent email, you thought that “too much time had elapsed”. This is, quite frankly, nonsense. As you are aware, Lambeth Council took me to the High Court in London on 16 July 2013 and attempted to obtain a permanent gagging order against me. Since then, of course, it has been established that that Council’s corrupt officers have been instrumental in having me incarcerated yet again.
Home Office
It is clear that all of this persecution against me (and vicariously my family) has been orchestrated at the very top level – the Home Office. I have evidence of this: in February 2010 (just two months after my ‘conviction’ at Southwark, an online blog called “Blood and Property” contacted MP Meg Hillier (of Hackney) who told the blog that she was unable to deal with its questions but that all questions should go through the Home Office. It is self-evident that some very corrupt people at Lambeth (including, but not limited to, child abusers) are being protected by the Home Office and, of course, that your colleague, Mrs Theresa May, is therefore guilty of allowing the human rights abuses of me and my family.
Further request for a constituency meeting
I asked for another meeting and note that your PA has failed to respond to me with some dates. Could it be that the Home Office is working on a narrative that it will return me to prison on yet another bogus charge – this time, perhaps, spuriously claiming that I have broken my licence conditions? Or are the spin doctors at the Home Office conspiring with Scotland Yard to create yet another false narrative of some ‘historical sex abuse case’ against me as a former teacher of 25 years (with never such accusations against me).
Proven lies by Lambeth Council in my wrongful dismissal
It may also interest you to know that Lambeth Council DID confess to the Blood and Property blog that I had NEVER been dismissed from Lambeth Council for “masturbating in a theatre” – this allegation coming from the teacher I dismissed for child grooming, racism and bullying. Now, it stands to reason that if this lie has finally been laid to rest, all of the other accusations brought against me by Lambeth Council are also false (which, for the record, I state that they are false.) This can be confirmed by employment law specialist Alex Passman, who told me in April 2007 “Brian, you are being set up by Lambeth Council.” He also confirmed that he had been accurately portrayed in my banned book from Hillsborough to Lambeth. I suggest that you contact Alex who will also confirm to you what he told me.
Third party proof of innocence
And, as you know from reading the Information Memorandum I gave you in May 2014 – at your request – Alasdair Palmer of the Daily Telegraph also confirmed that I could not possibly be guilty of the crime of incitement (or an attempt). He confirmed this as long ago as 20 August 2012 – yet the corrupt CCRC has failed to quash that conviction. This, of course, is being orchestrated by the Home Office as it continues its persecution of me and my innocent daughter and grandchildren.
Gross Prosecutorial Abuse by Tristan Chaize
Furthermore, at the bogus trial for alleged breaches of a non-existent Restraining Order in July 2015 at the Inner London Crown Court, Prosecutor Tristan Chaize of Tunbridge Wells said to me “You think you are somebody because you have a banned book and two gagging orders against you, but I’m telling you that you’re nothing…you’re a nobody… you have all these criminal convictions against you…your family don’t want to know you … ” and so his mindless rant continued. Now, being an intelligent man and being a qualified counsellor and having studied psychology for over 50 years, it doesn’t take a genius to work out that the very OPPOSITE is true. Mr Chaize rather inelegantly attempted to make me feel bad but, as Eleanor Roosevelt once proclaimed “Nobody can make you feel bad without your consent” and, of course, I did not give Mr Chaize my consent. That he has clearly sold his soul is not my concern – that is a matter for his own conscience if he still possesses one.
You will recall that, on your suggestion, I asked you to send Christmas cards and birthday cards to my family members from your office. In any event, the cards never reached them. An innocent bystander, the “man on the Clapham omnibus” or the “reasonable person” as defined by the Courts, might reasonably assume that you were setting me up to fail so that I could be imprisoned just as the time Lambeth Council was to feature in the Independent Inquiry into Child Sexual Abuse.
The Home Secretary and RIPA
I have written to the Home Secretary on at least six occasions asking for a copy of the Warrant under which I am being kept under constant surveillance and have been since 2006 when I first blew the whistle on child abuse in Lambeth (since corroborated by retired DCI Clive Driscoll, the Shirley Oaks Survivors Association [SOSA], Anna Tapsell, Tom Pettifor of the Daily Mirror et al).
I ask that you write to the Home Secretary to provide me with a True Copy of the Warrant obtained against me under RIPA 2000.
For the avoidance of doubt, I am continually held under surveillance to this day. All forms of my communications are still being intercepted, monitored and often “lost” in transit or transmission. Please ask the Home Secretary under what authority she believes she is acting.
My beloved family
You suggested in your email to me that I contact my daughter through a third party to seek a reconciliation. I showed this to my probation officer – a mere pawn in the game of chess played by the Home Office – and she said that if I followed your advice she would send me back to prison. (She is working in the belief that she can scare me.) Now, you have given me advice regarding my family which saw me imprisoned unlawfully and almost imprisoned (had I followed it). Perhaps you can now understand why in certain quarters in Norfolk the idea has been mooted that your actions against me are maliciously motivated and not helpful as they ought to be from an MP to his or her constituent. You will understand, of course, I merely report the “word on the street” and do not necessarily subscribe to that view.
My aims
My aims remain the same as they have always been from Day One:
1. Quash my convictions (they are all bogus and against the rule of law);
2. To be re-united with my family (after the Met lied to them in order to ‘divide and conquer’ and provide me with no emotional or financial support;
3. To be significantly compensated by the State for the detriment caused to me by some corrupt agents of State
Your constituent
You attempted to claim in your previous email to me that I might not be your constituent since I am not on the electoral roll. You will know, of course, that you have thousands of constituents who are not on the roll and I am one of them.
You then attempted to threaten me by saying that I should be fortunate that you are my MP since no other MP in the country would be willing to help.
Should your line of reasoning be followed to its conclusion, that would make me a Stateless person, bringing another interesting perspective to this long, sorry State-controlled sage brought about to cover-up child abuse and police corruption.
Policing by Consent
It is clear that in the UK, policing is by consent. I have written to the Home Secretary and removed my consent to be policed. I commit no crimes and therefore I have no business with the Police. They think it’s rather amusing to stop me and ask if I have any underage girls in the back of my car, or accuse me of jumping red traffic lights or to ask why I have tinted windows on my car. Please write to Mrs May and inform her that I have absolutely no interest in the Police (other than exposing corrupt ones) and that they have no consent to approach me, talk to me, or apprehend me in any way.
Simon Bailey, Chief Constable Norfolk
I ask that you contact Mr Bailey to ask him to provide answers to the following in writing:
1. What does he propose to do about my Apple McIntosh computer his officers unlawfully seized from Ivy Farm, Tilney All Saints on 2 August 2013?
2. Why has he allowed his officers to manipulate documents against me à la Hillsborough?
3. Why, as national lead for child abuse, has he failed to meet me with regarding my book from Hillsborough to Lambeth?
4. Why has he abused his position of trust in allowing human rights abuses to be perpetrated against me?
5. Why did he sanction 12 visits to Darby Farm, Pott Row by officers under his control and yet not one of those visits was lawfully recorded as is normal police protocol?
I have little doubt that you will take mock offence at this latest communication. For a politician with as many years in Parliament as you have, you do rather seem to have a somewhat thin skin.
I look forward to our next meeting when, I hope, you have some good news to impart along the following lines:
1. Meetings lined up with Michael Mansfield, QC to quash my spurious convictions;
2. A meeting with my family in which they can be told the Truth by Mr Mansfield and Baroness Lawrence (whose family also suffered through police corruption);
3. Meetings with bona fide high-profile lawyers to bring claims against Lambeth Council, Off Centre, the Met Police, Essex Police, Norfolk Police and others.
Yours sincerely,
Brian Pead
AN OPEN LETTER (and attachment, Information Memorandum, version 7 – provided at your request)
As you will see, I have ensured that I have copied this email to law lecturers at the University of Greenwich, at which I studied in 2010 following the conviction for Incitement at Southwark in December 2009 which you have finally acknowledged as being unsafe.
Kim Everett, University of Greenwich law lecturer
I discussed this case at great length with my Law Tutor, Kim Everett, and she confirmed that I could not possibly be guilty of such a crime under the rule of law. She advised me not to mention the word ‘ corruption’, but I did not heed her advice because of Hillsborough (a football match which, as you know, I attended). Professor Phil Scraton has gone on the public record using the word ‘corruption’ because that is precisely what occurred at Hillsborough and what occurred in my trial at Southwark in 2009 and subsequent trials in a decade-long campaign of persecution against me as described by retired Scotland Yard detective chief inspector Clive Driscoll in a meeting with me on 09 March 2015 (just 10 days before my unlawful incarceration).
It should also be noted that when I met with Ms Everett in December 2014, she told me “It wasn’t me who screwed you over at the University, Brian.” I leave you to draw your own inferences to her remarks. For the public record, I know full well to whom she was referring.
My ‘tone’
I note from your last email that you were not happy with my ‘tone’. I make no apologies for that. You have had full chapter and verse on the human rights abuses of me and my family for 3 years since I first gave you a copy of Framed! on October 2013 (and a second, signed copy on 15 April 2016). You were presented with an Information Memorandum – at your request – in May 2014 when I took it to your house in Congham, Norfolk
Thus you have been in possession of all of the facts of (a) my innocence in all matters and (b) the human rights abuses (including my Article 3 Official Complaint) for some time and not written a single letter on my behalf, save for a letter to Prisons Minister Andrew Selous who attempted to justify my being ghosted between 10 prisons in just 12 weeks in 2014 (just days after I provided you with incontrovertible evidence of my innocence and police corruption à la Hillsborough).
In some quarters in Norfolk it has been suggested that your knighthood was a reward for sitting on my cases and failing to work towards a resolution. On 15 April 2016, you stated that you would “go at this hammer and tongs” on my behalf. This has not happened. In your previous email, you stated that you had written to Michael Mansfield QC yet failed to provide a copy of that letter to me. Anyone can provide a letter, back-date it and pass it off as having been sent on my behalf some days/ weeks ago.
My meritorious claim v Lambeth Council
On 17 February 2015, when we met at the Knights Hill Hotel, you urged me to bring a claim against Lambeth Council because you recognised – as a Tort lawyer – that I had a meritorious claim against that corrupt Borough (this also the opinion of Alex Passman et al)
However, in your most recent email, you thought that “too much time had elapsed”. This is, quite frankly, nonsense. As you are aware, Lambeth Council took me to the High Court in London on 16 July 2013 and attempted to obtain a permanent gagging order against me. Since then, of course, it has been established that that Council’s corrupt officers have been instrumental in having me incarcerated yet again.
Home Office
It is clear that all of this persecution against me (and vicariously my family) has been orchestrated at the very top level – the Home Office. I have evidence of this: in February 2010 (just two months after my ‘conviction’ at Southwark, an online blog called “Blood and Property” contacted MP Meg Hillier (of Hackney) who told the blog that she was unable to deal with its questions but that all questions should go through the Home Office. It is self-evident that some very corrupt people at Lambeth (including, but not limited to, child abusers) are being protected by the Home Office and, of course, that your colleague, Mrs Theresa May, is therefore guilty of allowing the human rights abuses of me and my family.
Further request for a constituency meeting
I asked for another meeting and note that your PA has failed to respond to me with some dates. Could it be that the Home Office is working on a narrative that it will return me to prison on yet another bogus charge – this time, perhaps, spuriously claiming that I have broken my licence conditions? Or are the spin doctors at the Home Office conspiring with Scotland Yard to create yet another false narrative of some ‘historical sex abuse case’ against me as a former teacher of 25 years (with never such accusations against me).
Proven lies by Lambeth Council in my wrongful dismissal
It may also interest you to know that Lambeth Council DID confess to the Blood and Property blog that I had NEVER been dismissed from Lambeth Council for “masturbating in a theatre” – this allegation coming from the teacher I dismissed for child grooming, racism and bullying. Now, it stands to reason that if this lie has finally been laid to rest, all of the other accusations brought against me by Lambeth Council are also false (which, for the record, I state that they are false.) This can be confirmed by employment law specialist Alex Passman, who told me in April 2007 “Brian, you are being set up by Lambeth Council.” He also confirmed that he had been accurately portrayed in my banned book from Hillsborough to Lambeth. I suggest that you contact Alex who will also confirm to you what he told me.
Third party proof of innocence
And, as you know from reading the Information Memorandum I gave you in May 2014 – at your request – Alasdair Palmer of the Daily Telegraph also confirmed that I could not possibly be guilty of the crime of incitement (or an attempt). He confirmed this as long ago as 20 August 2012 – yet the corrupt CCRC has failed to quash that conviction. This, of course, is being orchestrated by the Home Office as it continues its persecution of me and my innocent daughter and grandchildren.
Gross Prosecutorial Abuse by Tristan Chaize
Furthermore, at the bogus trial for alleged breaches of a non-existent Restraining Order in July 2015 at the Inner London Crown Court, Prosecutor Tristan Chaize of Tunbridge Wells said to me “You think you are somebody because you have a banned book and two gagging orders against you, but I’m telling you that you’re nothing…you’re a nobody… you have all these criminal convictions against you…your family don’t want to know you … ” and so his mindless rant continued. Now, being an intelligent man and being a qualified counsellor and having studied psychology for over 50 years, it doesn’t take a genius to work out that the very OPPOSITE is true. Mr Chaize rather inelegantly attempted to make me feel bad but, as Eleanor Roosevelt once proclaimed “Nobody can make you feel bad without your consent” and, of course, I did not give Mr Chaize my consent. That he has clearly sold his soul is not my concern – that is a matter for his own conscience if he still possesses one.
You will recall that, on your suggestion, I asked you to send Christmas cards and birthday cards to my family members from your office. In any event, the cards never reached them. An innocent bystander, the “man on the Clapham omnibus” or the “reasonable person” as defined by the Courts, might reasonably assume that you were setting me up to fail so that I could be imprisoned just as the time Lambeth Council was to feature in the Independent Inquiry into Child Sexual Abuse.
The Home Secretary and RIPA
I have written to the Home Secretary on at least six occasions asking for a copy of the Warrant under which I am being kept under constant surveillance and have been since 2006 when I first blew the whistle on child abuse in Lambeth (since corroborated by retired DCI Clive Driscoll, the Shirley Oaks Survivors Association [SOSA], Anna Tapsell, Tom Pettifor of the Daily Mirror et al).
I ask that you write to the Home Secretary to provide me with a True Copy of the Warrant obtained against me under RIPA 2000.
For the avoidance of doubt, I am continually held under surveillance to this day. All forms of my communications are still being intercepted, monitored and often “lost” in transit or transmission. Please ask the Home Secretary under what authority she believes she is acting.
My beloved family
You suggested in your email to me that I contact my daughter through a third party to seek a reconciliation. I showed this to my probation officer – a mere pawn in the game of chess played by the Home Office – and she said that if I followed your advice she would send me back to prison. (She is working in the belief that she can scare me.) Now, you have given me advice regarding my family which saw me imprisoned unlawfully and almost imprisoned (had I followed it). Perhaps you can now understand why in certain quarters in Norfolk the idea has been mooted that your actions against me are maliciously motivated and not helpful as they ought to be from an MP to his or her constituent. You will understand, of course, I merely report the “word on the street” and do not necessarily subscribe to that view.
My aims
My aims remain the same as they have always been from Day One:
1. Quash my convictions (they are all bogus and against the rule of law);
2. To be re-united with my family (after the Met lied to them in order to ‘divide and conquer’ and provide me with no emotional or financial support;
3. To be significantly compensated by the State for the detriment caused to me by some corrupt agents of State
Your constituent
You attempted to claim in your previous email to me that I might not be your constituent since I am not on the electoral roll. You will know, of course, that you have thousands of constituents who are not on the roll and I am one of them.
You then attempted to threaten me by saying that I should be fortunate that you are my MP since no other MP in the country would be willing to help.
Should your line of reasoning be followed to its conclusion, that would make me a Stateless person, bringing another interesting perspective to this long, sorry State-controlled sage brought about to cover-up child abuse and police corruption.
Policing by Consent
It is clear that in the UK, policing is by consent. I have written to the Home Secretary and removed my consent to be policed. I commit no crimes and therefore I have no business with the Police. They think it’s rather amusing to stop me and ask if I have any underage girls in the back of my car, or accuse me of jumping red traffic lights or to ask why I have tinted windows on my car. Please write to Mrs May and inform her that I have absolutely no interest in the Police (other than exposing corrupt ones) and that they have no consent to approach me, talk to me, or apprehend me in any way.
Simon Bailey, Chief Constable Norfolk
I ask that you contact Mr Bailey to ask him to provide answers to the following in writing:
1. What does he propose to do about my Apple McIntosh computer his officers unlawfully seized from Ivy Farm, Tilney All Saints on 2 August 2013?
2. Why has he allowed his officers to manipulate documents against me à la Hillsborough?
3. Why, as national lead for child abuse, has he failed to meet me with regarding my book from Hillsborough to Lambeth?
4. Why has he abused his position of trust in allowing human rights abuses to be perpetrated against me?
5. Why did he sanction 12 visits to Darby Farm, Pott Row by officers under his control and yet not one of those visits was lawfully recorded as is normal police protocol?
I have little doubt that you will take mock offence at this latest communication. For a politician with as many years in Parliament as you have, you do rather seem to have a somewhat thin skin.
I look forward to our next meeting when, I hope, you have some good news to impart along the following lines:
1. Meetings lined up with Michael Mansfield, QC to quash my spurious convictions;
2. A meeting with my family in which they can be told the Truth by Mr Mansfield and Baroness Lawrence (whose family also suffered through police corruption);
3. Meetings with bona fide high-profile lawyers to bring claims against Lambeth Council, Off Centre, the Met Police, Essex Police, Norfolk Police and others.
Yours sincerely,
Brian Pead
No comments:
Post a Comment