Brian Pead meets Driscoll of the Yard

MINUTES OF MEETING
Date: 09 March 2015
Venue: The Port Jackson public house, Bishop’s Stortford, Essex
Attendees: retired Detective Chief Inspector Clive Driscoll [CD],
Michael Bird [MB] (co-author of From Hillsborough to Lambeth),
William Brian Freeman [WBF] (formerly known as Brian Pead) (co-author of From Hillsborough to Lambeth) and other books including FRAMED! and 10Prisons12Weeks
1. CD opened the meeting by declaring that he had called it in order to “seek justice for Brian and his family”;
2. CD added that Lambeth Council was known to be a ‘corrupt Borough’ and that a common consensus was that “everyone was on the fiddle”;
3. The consequence of [2] was that people who came to learn about child abuse perpetrated by others would not expose it for fear of themselves being exposed for wrongdoing such as, for example, financial mismanagement;
4. CD added that there was a strong Catholic and Masonic presence in Lambeth and within the Police;
5. WBF informed CD that the female teacher he dismissed for grooming and other offences had been a teacher at St Augustine’s Catholic School in Ealing and that the Executive Director of Lambeth’s Children and Young People’s Service is a Governor at La Retraite Catholic School in Lambeth;
6. CD commented that “Lambeth have been vicious to you, Brian, and it can’t be just because of what you wrote in the book from Hillsborough to Lambeth”;
7. CD stated that he read the book and agreed with its contents;
8. CD stated that WBF was “…flagged up at Scotland Yard as being a major threat because of your research and books…” and that WBF had been “…subjected to a sustained period of persecution by the Met as a direct consequence of this…”;
9. CD suggested that WBF write to his MP seeking justice, to enquire whether he is on the Sex Offenders’ Register (since people are sometimes added to it in error), if he is on it, why he is on it and for what period of time;
10. CD said that he would try to obtain a transcript of the entire Southwark trial;
11. CD stated that a major difficulty with quashing the Southwark (2009) conviction for alleged incitement was that WBF had “out-stung” a police sting operation and that if Brian’s conviction had been quashed it might have led to hundreds (if not thousands) of other convictions being quashed at great cost to the Government in terms of (a) compensation and (b) a large number of unsafe convictions;
12. WBF stated – and this was confirmed by MB – that it was an injustice to him and his family that his conviction “might not yet be quashed” simply because of other cases. WBF stated that he was not interested in other cases, only his own;
13. CD added that the case of alleged incitement of a non-existent girl (Southwark, 2009) could and should be quashed because of misdirections from the judge, his placing the jury under duress to reach a decision on the last day of the Michaelmas Term and mis-Joinder;
14. WBF added that there were a number of significant abuses of process in the Southwark conviction which could ordinarily lead to his conviction being quashed and not necessarily convictions of others whose circumstances could be very different from his own;
15. WBF informed CD that he (WBF) had two (2) police national computer (PNC) records, and this was confirmed by MB;
16. CD stated that it was not ordinarily possible for anybody to have two such records and that one must clearly be false;
17. MB confirmed that at Southend Police station in January 2013, a civilian administrator also stated that the record he had called up on the PNC appeared to be false;
18. WBF stated that this record contained at least six (6) convictions for rapes and other sexual assaults against females under 13 and that none of them was true;
19. CD stated that they could not have been true because otherwise Brian would not be at liberty;
20. CD stated that this false record needed to be expunged – he suggested that WBF write to the Commissioner of the Met, Sir Bernard Hogan-Howe and inform him that WBF has never been arrested, charged, indicted for these offences, that it was dishonest of someone to create a second PNC record showing false data, that there has been a lot of corruption in WBF’s cases and also conspiracy and “…huge breaches of you and your family’s human rights…”;
21. WBF stated that he would do this within the next week or two [Editor’s Note: this was not possible since Brian was committed to prison and had no written records with him];
22. CD suggested that WBF obtain the MAPPA file against him because (a) he is entitled to it and (b) it is likely to throw up information that would prove mistakes had been made on the part of the Police and/or Lambeth Council;
23. CD suggested that Brian write to the Department of Professional Standards, Empress State Building, London;
24. WBF stated that he knew of two rogue officers within that building and was therefore loathe to have their own colleagues investigate them as such investigations usually resulted in a whitewash;
25. CD stated that it was appalling the effect that these cases were not only having on WBF but also his daughter and grandchildren and that, as a grandfather himself, he could not imagine the distress this was causing both to WBF and his family members;
26. WBF mentioned that his son-in-law owned a garage repairing vehicles for the Met Police and that the police could well have taken advantage of this business relationship to turn Brian’s family against him and feed them false information;
27. CD added that it was likely they have been misinformed and shown false documents against WBF which had led them to no longer have contact;
28. CD added that there was “…undoubtedly an element of dishonesty…” somewhere in all of these cases, stating that had Brian been guilty of the alleged improper activity online, then he (CD) would not have prosecuted but – at most – written a warning letter about conduct. CD said that he could not understand why the case ever went to court at Southwark in 2009;
29. CD added that in his opinion WBF ought to write to his MP about numerous breaches of the Human Rights Act 1998 and that people in various agencies of State were clearly making decisions based on false PNC records and other data;
30. WBF informed CD about his and his brothers’ abuse in a children’s home in Harpenden, Hertfordshire known as ‘The Oval’ from 1955 to 1960 and CD suggested that WBF write to the MP for Harpenden [Editor’s Note: due to his incarceration without recourse to his records, this was not achieved until 08 April 2016];
31. CD asked what level of compensation that WBF would ultimately be seeking – WBF stated that he had initiated a claim against Lambeth in 2013 for £5million;
32. CD suggested that this might be “selling yourself short considering everything that Lambeth have done to you over almost a decade”;
33. A figure of £30 million was suggested to include claims against Lambeth Council, three police forces, Off Centre counselling charity and other organisations and individuals;
34. WBF invited CD to write a chapter for a second edition of the book From Hillsborough to Lambeth but CD stated that he would be unable to do so given that there are on-going investigations into child abuse in Lambeth Council;
35. WBF informed CD that he was writing a new book about the Tony Martin case in 1999 and invited CD to write a chapter about that case – CD stated that he would be pleased to since “…murder is my speciality…”;
36. CD stated that he believed that Michael Mansfield would be “…an ideal barrister…” to assist Brian in quashing his convictions, restoring his good name and receiving compensation;
37. MB agreed that this would be a good choice of barrister;
38. WBF stated that he would be willing to work with Mr Mansfield;
39. CD stated that he would approach Mr Mansfield on WBF’s behalf [Editor’s Note: this has not yet been achieved];
40. CD provided a business card to MB and WBF – this card included CD’s home address and mobile telephone number.
41. END OF MINUTES ………………………………………………………………

Scotland Yard being held accountable in child abuse cover-up

Monday, May 16th, 2016 by admin

From: w.b.freeman
16 May 2016
Dear Metropolitan Police Service (MPS),
1. Can Scotland Yard explain why Brian Pead has TWO police national computer records?
2. Can Scotland Yard explain why Brian Pead was placed un lawful surveillance from 2006 when he exposed child abuse in Lambeth?
3. Can Scotland Yard explain why Brian Pead’s daughter and grandchildren did not attend Bexley Magistrates’ Court on 1st November 2011 and yet the Court issued a bogus Restraining Order against him for the alleged harassment of his daughter, Sorrel Birch, and grandchildren Emily, Lauren and Joseph?
4. Can Scotland Yard explain why retired Detective Chief inspector Clive Driscoll stated on 09 March 2015 that Brian and his family had been persecuted by the Met for 10 years? (see attached Minutes of the meeting)
5. Can Scotland Yard explain why PC John Brown, of Bexley Police, who was castigated by Judge Robinson at Woolwich Crown Court in January 2012 for lying and providing false evidence to the court, has never been charged with perverting the course of public justice and other criminal offences?
6. Can Scotland Yard explain why corrupt DC Julia Godfrey and DS Jason Tunn, who unlawfully seized a computer belonging to Geoffrey Bacon – a man of integrity – were not charged under the Computer Misuse Act and why they have not been charged with perverting the course of justice?
7. Can Scotland Yard explain why Nicola Noone, from the counselling charity Off Centre, was never prosecuted for perjury at Southwark in December 2009 at Brian Pead’s bogus trial for the alleged incitement of a non-existent 14 year old female?
8. Can Scotland Yard explain why Brian Pead continues to be persecuted by the Police when he does not commit crime?
9. Can Scotland Yard provide a copy of the Warrant issued under the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000 authorising them to keep Brian Pead under constant surveillance since 2006?
10. Can Scotland Yard provide a copy of the police submission for a Warrant to conduct house searches on the house of Geoffrey Bacon, of Brian Pead and the offices of Off Centre?
11. Can Scotland Yard provide a copy of the Court Register at Bexley Magistrates’ Court from 01 November 2011 showing the trial that allegedly took place there and any Order of the Court made there that day?
12. Can Scotland Yard explain the comment made by legal representative Marcia Weise at Charing Cross police station on 04 June 2008 to Brian Pead – “You have been intelligent enough to out-sting an illegal police sting operation and they will be out to get you!” ?
13. Can Scotland Yard confirm that it has been instrumental in a cover-up of child abuse in Lambeth in the period 2005-2007?
14. Can Scotland Yard confirm DCI Driscoll’s comments that Brian Pead’s family have also been persecuted by way of false allegations against him are true?
15. Can Scotland Yard provide the chain of custody relating to Geoffrey Bacon’s computer unlawfully seized from his house on 31 July 2008?
16. Can Scotland Yard confirm that Brian Pead has never been dismissed from Lambeth Council for allegedly being masturbated in a theatre?
17. Can Scotland Yard confirm that Phyllis Dunipace, OBE was once Executive Director of Children and Young People’s Service in Lambeth?
18. Can Scotland Yard explain why secretary Beverley Williams said to Brian Pead: “You are being treated so badly by Lambeth” when referring to his unlawful dismissal?
19. Can Scotland Yard explain why employment law expert Alex Passman told Brian Pead in April 2007 that he was “being set up by Lambeth Council” in relation to the bogus disciplinary proceedings against him?
20. Can Scotland Yard confirm that it was instrumental in getting the book “from Hillsborough to Lambeth” banned at the High Court and if so, can it provide a copy of the Court order for our records?
Yours faithfully,
w.b.freeman

Andy Burnham MP sent email on Lambeth child abuse by Brian Pead

Monday, May 16th, 2016 by admin

Today, Brian Pead sent MP Andy Burnham further evidence of child abuse in Lambeth. It remains to be seen whether the Leigh, Manchester MP is as pro-active in securing Justice for Brian Pead and his family as he was in the Hillsborough disaster. 

Brian Pead sends Open Letter to MP Sir Henry Bellingham re Lambeth child abuse cover-up

Tuesday, May 17th, 2016 by admin

Dear Sir Henry,
AN OPEN LETTER (and attachment, Information Memorandum, version 7 – provided at your request)
As you will see, I have ensured that I have copied this email to law lecturers at the University of Greenwich, at which I studied in 2010 following the conviction for Incitement at Southwark in December 2009 which you have finally acknowledged as being unsafe.
Kim Everett, University of Greenwich law lecturer
I discussed this case at great length with my Law Tutor, Kim Everett, and she confirmed that I could not possibly be guilty of such a crime under the rule of law. She advised me not to mention the word ‘ corruption’, but I did not heed her advice because of Hillsborough (a football match which, as you know, I attended). Professor Phil Scraton has gone on the public record using the word ‘corruption’ because that is precisely what occurred at Hillsborough and what occurred in my trial at Southwark in 2009 and subsequent trials in a decade-long campaign of persecution against me as described by retired Scotland Yard detective chief inspector Clive Driscoll in a meeting with me on 09 March 2015 (just 10 days before my unlawful incarceration).
It should also be noted that when I met with Ms Everett in December 2014, she told me “It wasn’t me who screwed you over at the University, Brian.” I leave you to draw your own inferences to her remarks. For the public record, I know full well to whom she was referring.
My ‘tone’
I note from your last email that you were not happy with my ‘tone’. I make no apologies for that. You have had full chapter and verse on the human rights abuses of me and my family for 3 years since I first gave you a copy of Framed! on October 2013 (and a second, signed copy on 15 April 2016). You were presented with an Information Memorandum – at your request – in May 2014 when I took it to your house in Congham, Norfolk
Thus you have been in possession of all of the facts of (a) my innocence in all matters and (b) the human rights abuses (including my Article 3 Official Complaint) for some time and not written a single letter on my behalf, save for a letter to Prisons Minister Andrew Selous who attempted to justify my being ghosted between 10 prisons in just 12 weeks in 2014 (just days after I provided you with incontrovertible evidence of my innocence and police corruption à la Hillsborough).
In some quarters in Norfolk it has been suggested that your knighthood was a reward for sitting on my cases and failing to work towards a resolution. On 15 April 2016, you stated that you would “go at this hammer and tongs” on my behalf. This has not happened. In your previous email, you stated that you had written to Michael Mansfield QC yet failed to provide a copy of that letter to me. Anyone can provide a letter, back-date it and pass it off as having been sent on my behalf some days/ weeks ago.
My meritorious claim v Lambeth Council
On 17 February 2015, when we met at the Knights Hill Hotel, you urged me to bring a claim against Lambeth Council because you recognised – as a Tort lawyer – that I had a meritorious claim against that corrupt Borough (this also the opinion of Alex Passman et al)
However, in your most recent email, you thought that “too much time had elapsed”. This is, quite frankly, nonsense. As you are aware, Lambeth Council took me to the High Court in London on 16 July 2013 and attempted to obtain a permanent gagging order against me. Since then, of course, it has been established that that Council’s corrupt officers have been instrumental in having me incarcerated yet again.
Home Office
It is clear that all of this persecution against me (and vicariously my family) has been orchestrated at the very top level – the Home Office. I have evidence of this: in February 2010 (just two months after my ‘conviction’ at Southwark, an online blog called “Blood and Property” contacted MP Meg Hillier (of Hackney) who told the blog that she was unable to deal with its questions but that all questions should go through the Home Office. It is self-evident that some very corrupt people at Lambeth (including, but not limited to, child abusers) are being protected by the Home Office and, of course, that your colleague, Mrs Theresa May, is therefore guilty of allowing the human rights abuses of me and my family.
Further request for a constituency meeting
I asked for another meeting and note that your PA has failed to respond to me with some dates. Could it be that the Home Office is working on a narrative that it will return me to prison on yet another bogus charge – this time, perhaps, spuriously claiming that I have broken my licence conditions? Or are the spin doctors at the Home Office conspiring with Scotland Yard to create yet another false narrative of some ‘historical sex abuse case’ against me as a former teacher of 25 years (with never such accusations against me).
Proven lies by Lambeth Council in my wrongful dismissal
It may also interest you to know that Lambeth Council DID confess to the Blood and Property blog that I had NEVER been dismissed from Lambeth Council for “masturbating in a theatre” – this allegation coming from the teacher I dismissed for child grooming, racism and bullying. Now, it stands to reason that if this lie has finally been laid to rest, all of the other accusations brought against me by Lambeth Council are also false (which, for the record, I state that they are false.) This can be confirmed by employment law specialist Alex Passman, who told me in April 2007 “Brian, you are being set up by Lambeth Council.” He also confirmed that he had been accurately portrayed in my banned book from Hillsborough to Lambeth. I suggest that you contact Alex who will also confirm to you what he told me.
Third party proof of innocence
And, as you know from reading the Information Memorandum I gave you in May 2014 – at your request – Alasdair Palmer of the Daily Telegraph also confirmed that I could not possibly be guilty of the crime of incitement (or an attempt). He confirmed this as long ago as 20 August 2012 – yet the corrupt CCRC has failed to quash that conviction. This, of course, is being orchestrated by the Home Office as it continues its persecution of me and my innocent daughter and grandchildren.
Gross Prosecutorial Abuse by Tristan Chaize
Furthermore, at the bogus trial for alleged breaches of a non-existent Restraining Order in July 2015 at the Inner London Crown Court, Prosecutor Tristan Chaize of Tunbridge Wells said to me “You think you are somebody because you have a banned book and two gagging orders against you, but I’m telling you that you’re nothing…you’re a nobody… you have all these criminal convictions against you…your family don’t want to know you … ” and so his mindless rant continued. Now, being an intelligent man and being a qualified counsellor and having studied psychology for over 50 years, it doesn’t take a genius to work out that the very OPPOSITE is true. Mr Chaize rather inelegantly attempted to make me feel bad but, as Eleanor Roosevelt once proclaimed “Nobody can make you feel bad without your consent” and, of course, I did not give Mr Chaize my consent. That he has clearly sold his soul is not my concern – that is a matter for his own conscience if he still possesses one.
You will recall that, on your suggestion, I asked you to send Christmas cards and birthday cards to my family members from your office. In any event, the cards never reached them. An innocent bystander, the “man on the Clapham omnibus” or the “reasonable person” as defined by the Courts, might reasonably assume that you were setting me up to fail so that I could be imprisoned just as the time Lambeth Council was to feature in the Independent Inquiry into Child Sexual Abuse.
The Home Secretary and RIPA
I have written to the Home Secretary on at least six occasions asking for a copy of the Warrant under which I am being kept under constant surveillance and have been since 2006 when I first blew the whistle on child abuse in Lambeth (since corroborated by retired DCI Clive Driscoll, the Shirley Oaks Survivors Association [SOSA], Anna Tapsell, Tom Pettifor of the Daily Mirror et al).
I ask that you write to the Home Secretary to provide me with a True Copy of the Warrant obtained against me under RIPA 2000.
For the avoidance of doubt, I am continually held under surveillance to this day. All forms of my communications are still being intercepted, monitored and often “lost” in transit or transmission. Please ask the Home Secretary under what authority she believes she is acting.
My beloved family
You suggested in your email to me that I contact my daughter through a third party to seek a reconciliation. I showed this to my probation officer – a mere pawn in the game of chess played by the Home Office – and she said that if I followed your advice she would send me back to prison. (She is working in the belief that she can scare me.) Now, you have given me advice regarding my family which saw me imprisoned unlawfully and almost imprisoned (had I followed it). Perhaps you can now understand why in certain quarters in Norfolk the idea has been mooted that your actions against me are maliciously motivated and not helpful as they ought to be from an MP to his or her constituent. You will understand, of course, I merely report the “word on the street” and do not necessarily subscribe to that view.
My aims
My aims remain the same as they have always been from Day One:
1. Quash my convictions (they are all bogus and against the rule of law);
2. To be re-united with my family (after the Met lied to them in order to ‘divide and conquer’ and provide me with no emotional or financial support;
3. To be significantly compensated by the State for the detriment caused to me by some corrupt agents of State
Your constituent
You attempted to claim in your previous email to me that I might not be your constituent since I am not on the electoral roll. You will know, of course, that you have thousands of constituents who are not on the roll and I am one of them.
You then attempted to threaten me by saying that I should be fortunate that you are my MP since no other MP in the country would be willing to help.
Should your line of reasoning be followed to its conclusion, that would make me a Stateless person, bringing another interesting perspective to this long, sorry State-controlled sage brought about to cover-up child abuse and police corruption.
Policing by Consent
It is clear that in the UK, policing is by consent. I have written to the Home Secretary and removed my consent to be policed. I commit no crimes and therefore I have no business with the Police. They think it’s rather amusing to stop me and ask if I have any underage girls in the back of my car, or accuse me of jumping red traffic lights or to ask why I have tinted windows on my car. Please write to Mrs May and inform her that I have absolutely no interest in the Police (other than exposing corrupt ones) and that they have no consent to approach me, talk to me, or apprehend me in any way.
Simon Bailey, Chief Constable Norfolk
I ask that you contact Mr Bailey to ask him to provide answers to the following in writing:
1. What does he propose to do about my Apple McIntosh computer his officers unlawfully seized from Ivy Farm, Tilney All Saints on 2 August 2013?
2. Why has he allowed his officers to manipulate documents against me à la Hillsborough?
3. Why, as national lead for child abuse, has he failed to meet me with regarding my book from Hillsborough to Lambeth?
4. Why has he abused his position of trust in allowing human rights abuses to be perpetrated against me?
5. Why did he sanction 12 visits to Darby Farm, Pott Row by officers under his control and yet not one of those visits was lawfully recorded as is normal police protocol?
I have little doubt that you will take mock offence at this latest communication. For a politician with as many years in Parliament as you have, you do rather seem to have a somewhat thin skin.
I look forward to our next meeting when, I hope, you have some good news to impart along the following lines:
1. Meetings lined up with Michael Mansfield, QC to quash my spurious convictions;
2. A meeting with my family in which they can be told the Truth by Mr Mansfield and Baroness Lawrence (whose family also suffered through police corruption);
3. Meetings with bona fide high-profile lawyers to bring claims against Lambeth Council, Off Centre, the Met Police, Essex Police, Norfolk Police and others.
Yours sincerely,
Brian Pead 

Theresa May’s former speech-writer at odds with Home Secretary

Tuesday, May 17th, 2016 by admin

Alasdair Palmer, Theresa May’s former speech-writer, sent an email to Brian Pead on 20 August 2012, stating:

“…I found your material extremely interesting. It is clear to me that 

  you were indeed the victim of an injustice, as you maintain…”

He referred, of course, to Brian’s unlawful conviction at Southwark Crown Court in 2009.
Since then, and some four years later, his former boss, Home Secretary Theresa May, no longer replies to Brian’s well-considered, polite letters exposing police corruption and child abuse in Lambeth Council.

Petition to cease State persecution of Brian Pead and his family

Wednesday, May 18th, 2016 by admin

Yesterday, Brian Pead created a Petition against his human rights abuses and those of his family.
You are asked to sign the Petition.

The petition reads:

Stop Human Rights Abuses of Brian Pead
In 2006, Brian Pead exposed child abuse in Lambeth Council. He was unlawfully dismissed from his job as Head Teacher and since then has been wrongly accused of being a sex offender, sent unlawfully to prison on four occasions, been beaten up in the street by Police, and separated from his beloved family.
State persecution on an industrial scale was perpetrated against Brian and his family because the Home Office wanted to cover-up child abuse and police corruption in Lambeth and the Met.

Click this link to sign the petition:
https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/130661/sponsors/jzzGEfg8hr4xKjraUT